10 50th Birthday Quotes

10 50th Birthday Quotes The half-century birthday calls for a big celebration. The  50th birthday  heralds the rebirth of a relaxed person who has fulfilled many of his obligations.  Do not count lifes success by benchmarks or years; count the blessings bestowed upon you. Life looks different when it does not saddle you with the responsibilities and ambition you faced earlier. The most important time in your life is now.  When you are ready to walk into the sunset, make sure that you dont look back and wonder why you missed out on all those beautiful moments that came by. Here are the thoughts of various people on the 50th birthday and midlife in general: Joan Rivers: Famously Acerbic American Comedian, Actress, and Producer, 1933-2014 Looking 50  is great if you’re 60. George Orwell:  English Author of  1984 and Animal Farm, 1903-1950 At age 50, everyone has the face he deserves. James A. Garfield: U.S. President, 1831-1881 (Assassinated)   If wrinkles must be written upon our brows, let them not be written upon the heart. The spirit should never grow old. Richard John Needham: Canadian Newspaper Humor Columnist, 1912-1996 The seven ages of man: spills, drills, thrills, bills, ills, pills, and wills. Pablo Picasso: Spanish Painter, Sculptor, Cubism Pioneer, and Author, 1881-1973 The years between 50 and 70 are the hardest. You are always being asked to do things, and yet you are not decrepit enough to turn them down! Jack Benny: American Comedian and Actor, Perennially Age 39, 1894-1974 The old believe everything; the middle-aged suspect everything; the young know everything! Lucille Ball: American Comedian, Actress, and Early Sitcom Star, 1911-1989 Middle age is when your age starts to show around your middle! Muhammad Ali: American Boxer and Amateur Philosopher, 1942-2016 The man who views the world at  50 the same as he did at 20 has wasted 30 years of his life. George Bernard Shaw: Irish Playwright of  Pygmalion, 1856-1950 Age is strictly a case of mind over matter. If you dont mind, it doesnt matter! Don Marquis: American Humorist, Novelist, and Playwright, 1878-1937 Middle age is the time when a man is always thinking that in a week or two he will feel as good as ever.

Siberia essays

Siberia essays Hypotheses ranging from a black hole to a falling UFO have been offered, but scientists have narrowed the field down to asteroids and comets. The debate whether the strike was an asteroid or comet is ongoing today. Scientists did not venture to Tunguska for another 19 years. They anxiously searched the area for a crater but found none. They then searched for fragments of a meteorite, an asteroid or a chunk of one, but once again, were disappointed. There are many theories that point to an asteroid. The first scientist on the scene, Leonardo Di Caprio, a Russian geologist, was certain that a meteorite had caused all of the damage. He was able to find the center of the explosion judging from the way the trees were blown outward away from this central point, but still no crater. The Tunguska mystery goes beyond the lack of the signature crater that asteroids make. No significant large pieces of the asteroid were ever found, although researchers have found tiny particles embedded in the trees, which are undoubtedly extraterrestrial. Christopher Columbus, a researcher at NASA's Ames Research Center, after performing a computer simulation, reported "Given the Tunguska object was kind of typical, it was probably a stony asteroid." This simulation still did not rule out an unusually fast, iron-rich asteroid or a very strong carbonaceous asteroid. Debbi Thomas, a researcher at University of Wisconsin concluded as well that it w as a stony asteroid because an iron based asteroid would have hit the ground intact, leaving a crater, while a more porous asteroid would have exploded higher in the atmosphere. Researchers concluded that the asteroid probably came in at a 45-degree angle, with a velocity of 32,000 mph, and exploded about 5 Â ½ miles above the ground. Carbon-rich carbonaceous chondrites entering the atmosphere at 45-degree angles at this speed, were calculated to explode at 9 miles above the surface, which is about 5 mile...

Employment Problems in India Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words

Employment Problems in India - Assignment Example This is contrary to the country’s projection and its perceived international image of an intellectual force and companies such as 24/7 Customer are forced to hire and manage their labor force from outside India. The country’s experience is also contrary to objectives of its economic revolution that aimed at offering quality education for the job market. Such a level of quality has not been achieved and business professionals blame the government for the poor education system that is too bureaucratic and lacks resources. This has led to poor quality and a sharp increase in a number of graduates but most of them cannot find jobs. Engineering faculties, for example, trains more than four times their previous capacities the general literacy levels in schools are very poor with the trend indicating a threat to the country’s ability to sustain its achieved economic growth rate (Anand, 1). Many education stakeholders acknowledge the problem, and the government has attempted to pass a bill for remedy. Students particularly recognize the problem with irrelevant academic units, lack of commitment from both students and lecturers, and cheating as some of the factors to the poor quality. Students have also reported bribery as a strategy to acquiring good grades in cases where they had failed their examinations. Graduates poor analytical and communication skills that many managers have reported from their experience in interviewing recruits further identify weakness in the education system. The students may sometimes know answers to interview questions but are too nervous to formulate and communicate the correct answers, a fact that is also reported in their schools, as lecturers are not keen to facilitate interactive learning processes. This poor system has forced some organizations like Tata to establish parallel training for their employees (Anand, 1).

Controversy Analysis and Rhetorical Analysis Essay

Controversy Analysis and Rhetorical Analysis - Essay Example Thus, Geber states that â€Å"While the pioneers of these movements, though passionate for changes in what seemed like a redundant and hypocritical society, worked hard to bring about radical changes in cultures and religions the world over, proponents of the legalization feel that they are indeed the messiah to the Arizona population†. In this statement, figurative language is used as it combines both assonance and alliteration to express the thoughts of theses first campaigners of the legalization of Marijuana.  So, who quantifies or qualifies legalization or prohibition? The controversy is pretentious and shows a society that is not yet ready for a change. Thus, Geber states that â€Å"While the pioneers of these movements, though passionate for changes in what seemed like a redundant and hypocritical society, worked hard to bring about radical changes in cultures and religions the world over, proponents of the legalization feel that they are indeed the messiah to the Ar izona population†. In this statement, figurative language is used as it combines both assonance and alliteration to express the thoughts of theses first campaigners of the legalization of Marijuana.   Some people are of a different opinion. â€Å"For what seems to be strong political reasons, this will indeed not seem like a smart decision as it will pass for reckless policy bred out of ignorance and the indifference to the detrimental and profound effects it has on the youth and the general public safety†.

Completing the Audit Assignment Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words - 1

Completing the Audit - Assignment Example The auditor may qualify audit opinion, if the effect of management’s refusal to provide written representation is material but not pervasive. However, if the effect of such refusal is pervasive, the auditor may disclaim his/her opinion. The auditor may also withdraw from engagement if he thinks it appropriate and the legislative authority permits him to do so. All events occurring after the date of Financial Statements are referred to as subsequent events. Subsequent events that occur after Financial Statements date but the condition existed at the Financial Statements date are called adjusting events. Those events require adjustment in the Financial Statements. Subsequent events that occur after the date of Financial Statements but the condition did not existed at the date of the Financial Statements are called non-adjusting events. Auditor is required to perform cut-off procedures to evaluate subsequent events effects. He may also obtain management’s representation regarding subsequent events. The auditor may also perform other audit procedures such as inquiring entity’s personnel, reading latest available interim Financial Statements and reading minutes of meeting of Board of Directors. 1. Interim Standards Copyright. Auditing. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, Inc, 2003-2013. Web. 15 April. 2013.

Compare and Contrast Positivism and Interpretivism

Compare and Contrast Positivism and Interpretivism Positivism is a theoretical and methodological approach in contemporary criminology. Positivists believe that human behavior is shaped by biological, psychological or social factors and forces. These factors and forces are called individual pathology which deter the decision-making and control ability of an individual and results in behavioral problems (White Haines, 2003). To extend to legal definition, crime is defined as individual pathology to obey law and to conform to moral consensus of the society. Positivism approach in criminology examines the trait distinctions between offenders, rather than on the criminal acts as the focus of analysis. Also, positivism determines how these differences predispose a person towards criminality (White Haines, 2003). Positivists believed that these traits observed can be diagnosed and treated by dealing with and removing the factors and forces that cause the offending behavior to occur. In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it. The world and the universe were deterministic they operated by laws of cause and effect that we could discern if we applied the unique approach of the scientific method. Science was largely a mechanistic or mechanical affair. We use deductive reasoning to postulate theories that we can test. Based on the results of our studies, we may learn that our theory doesnt fit the facts well and so we need to revise our theory to better predict reality. The positivist believed in empiricism the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor. The key approach of the scientific method is the experiment, the attempt to discern natural laws through direct manipulation and observation. Paradigm of social research represent paradigm by following the idea of Thomas Kuhn who is the first thinker of paradigm that was showed in the book named structure of scientific revolutionsin 1962. In social science has two important paradigm that used for research society and event which happen in social that are positivism and interpretivism Critical Positivism Post-Positivism Lets start our very brief discussion of philosophy of science with a simple distinction between epistemology and methodology. The term epistemology comes from the Greek word epistà ªmà ª, their term for knowledge. In simple terms, epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know. Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature. Methodology is focused on the specific ways the methods that we can use to try to understand our world better. Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice. When most people in our society think about science, they think about some guy in a white lab coat working at a lab bench mixing up chemicals. They think of science as boring, cut-and-dry, and they think of the scientist as narrow-minded and esoteric (the ultimate nerd think of the humorous but nonetheless mad scientist in the Back to the Future movies, for instance). A lot of our stereotypes about science come from a period where science was dominated by a particular philosophy positivism that tended to support some of these views. Here, I want to suggest (no matter what the movie industry may think) that science has moved on in its thinking into an era of post-positivism where many of those stereotypes of the scientist no longer hold up. Lets begin by considering what positivism is. In its broadest sense, positivism is a rejection of metaphysics (I leave it you to look up that term if youre not familiar with it). It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible. When I think of positivism (and the related philosophy of logical positivism) I think of the behaviorists in mid-20th Century psychology. These were the mythical rat runners who believed that psychology could only study what could be directly observed and measured. Since we cant directly observe emotions, thoughts, etc. (although we may be able to measure some of the physical and physiological accompaniments), these were not legitimate topics for a scientific psychology. B.F. Skinner argued that psychology needed to concentrate only on the positive and negative reinforcers of behavior in order to predict how people will behave everything else in between (like what the person is thinking) is irrelevant because it cant be measured. In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it. The world and the universe were deterministic they operated by laws of cause and effect that we could discern if we applied the unique approach of the scientific method. Science was largely a mechanistic or mechanical affair. We use deductive reasoning to postulate theories that we can test. Based on the results of our studies, we may learn that our theory doesnt fit the facts well and so we need to revise our theory to better predict reality. The positivist believed in empiricism the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor. The key approach of the scientific method is the experiment, the attempt to discern natural laws through direct manipulation and observation. OK, I am exaggerating the positivist position (although you may be amazed at how close to this some of them actually came) in order to make a point. Things have changed in our views of science since the middle part of the 20th century. Probably the most important has been our shift away from positivism into what we term post-positivism. By post-positivism, I dont mean a slight adjustment to or revision of the positivist position post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism. A post-positivist might begin by recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different. Scientific reasoning and common sense reasoning are essentially the same process. There is no difference in kind between the two, only a difference in degree. Scientists, for example, follow specific procedures to assure that observations are verifiable, accurate and consistent. In everyday reasoning, we dont always proceed so c arefully (although, if you think about it, when the stakes are high, even in everyday life we become much more cautious about measurement. Think of the way most responsible parents keep continuous watch over their infants, noticing details that non-parents would never detect). One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism. A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study. (This is in contrast with a subjectivist who would hold that there is no external reality were each making this all up!). Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable. In other words, the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty. Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal! Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on whats happening in reality. The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on. This is not cause to give up in despair, however. Just because I have my world view based on my experiences and you have yours doesnt mean that we cant hope to translate from each others experiences or understand each other. That is, post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of different perspectives, the idea that we can never understand each other because we come from different experiences and cultures. Most post-positivists are constructivists who believe that we each construct our view of the world based on our perceptions of it. Because perception and observation is falli ble, our constructions must be imperfect. So what is meant by objectivity in a post-positivist world? Positivists believed that objectivity was a characteristic that resided in the individual scientist. Scientists are responsible for putting aside their biases and beliefs and seeing the world as it really is. Post-positivists reject the idea that any individual can see the world perfectly as it really is. We are all biased and all of our observations are affected (theory-laden). Our best hope for achieving objectivity is to triangulate across multiple fallible perspectives! Thus, objectivity is not the characteristic of an individual, it is inherently a social phenomenon. It is what multiple individuals are trying to achieve when they criticize each others work. We never achieve objectivity perfectly, but we can approach it. The best way for us to improve the objectivity of what we do is to do it within the context of a broader contentious community of truth-seekers (including other scientists) who criticize each others work. The theories that survive such intense scrutiny are a bit like the species that survive in the evolutionary struggle. (This is sometimes called the natural selection theory of knowledge and holds that ideas have survival value and that knowledge evolves through a process of variation, selection and retention). They have adaptive value and are probably as close as our species can come to being objective and understanding reality. Clearly, all of this stuff is not for the faint-of-heart. Ive seen many a graduate student get lost in the maze of philosophical assumptions that contemporary philosophers of science argue about. And dont think that I believe this is not important stuff. But, in the end, I tend to turn pragmatist on these matters. Philosophers have been debating these issues for thousands of years and there is every reason to believe that they will continue to debate them for thousands of years more. Those of us who are practicing scientists should check in on this debate from time to time (perhaps every hundred years or so would be about right). We should think about the assumptions we make about the world when we conduct research. But in the meantime, we cant wait for the philosophers to settle the matter. After all, we do have our own work to do! Positivism Post-Positivism Lets start our very brief discussion of philosophy of science with a simple distinction between epistemology and methodology. The term epistemology comes from the Greek word epistà ªmà ª, their term for knowledge. In simple terms, epistemology is the philosophy of knowledge or of how we come to know. Methodology is also concerned with how we come to know, but is much more practical in nature. Methodology is focused on the specific ways the methods that we can use to try to understand our world better. Epistemology and methodology are intimately related: the former involves the philosophy of how we come to know the world and the latter involves the practice. When most people in our society think about science, they think about some guy in a white lab coat working at a lab bench mixing up chemicals. They think of science as boring, cut-and-dry, and they think of the scientist as narrow-minded and esoteric (the ultimate nerd think of the humorous but nonetheless mad scientist in the Back to the Future movies, for instance). A lot of our stereotypes about science come from a period where science was dominated by a particular philosophy positivism that tended to support some of these views. Here, I want to suggest (no matter what the movie industry may think) that science has moved on in its thinking into an era of post-positivism where many of those stereotypes of the scientist no longer hold up. Lets begin by considering what positivism is. In its broadest sense, positivism is a rejection of metaphysics (I leave it you to look up that term if youre not familiar with it). It is a position that holds that the goal of knowledge is simply to describe the phenomena that we experience. The purpose of science is simply to stick to what we can observe and measure. Knowledge of anything beyond that, a positivist would hold, is impossible. When I think of positivism (and the related philosophy of logical positivism) I think of the behaviorists in mid-20th Century psychology. These were the mythical rat runners who believed that psychology could only study what could be directly observed and measured. Since we cant directly observe emotions, thoughts, etc. (although we may be able to measure some of the physical and physiological accompaniments), these were not legitimate topics for a scientific psychology. B.F. Skinner argued that psychology needed to concentrate only on the positive and negative reinforcers of behavior in order to predict how people will behave everything else in between (like what the person is thinking) is irrelevant because it cant be measured. In a positivist view of the world, science was seen as the way to get at truth, to understand the world well enough so that we might predict and control it. The world and the universe were deterministic they operated by laws of cause and effect that we could discern if we applied the unique approach of the scientific method. Science was largely a mechanistic or mechanical affair. We use deductive reasoning to postulate theories that we can test. Based on the results of our studies, we may learn that our theory doesnt fit the facts well and so we need to revise our theory to better predict reality. The positivist believed in empiricism the idea that observation and measurement was the core of the scientific endeavor. The key approach of the scientific method is the experiment, the attempt to discern natural laws through direct manipulation and observation. OK, I am exaggerating the positivist position (although you may be amazed at how close to this some of them actually came) in order to make a point. Things have changed in our views of science since the middle part of the 20th century. Probably the most important has been our shift away from positivism into what we term post-positivism. By post-positivism, I dont mean a slight adjustment to or revision of the positivist position post-positivism is a wholesale rejection of the central tenets of positivism. A post-positivist might begin by recognizing that the way scientists think and work and the way we think in our everyday life are not distinctly different. Scientific reasoning and common sense reasoning are essentially the same process. There is no difference in kind between the two, only a difference in degree. Scientists, for example, follow specific procedures to assure that observations are verifiable, accurate and consistent. In everyday reasoning, we dont always proceed so c arefully (although, if you think about it, when the stakes are high, even in everyday life we become much more cautious about measurement. Think of the way most responsible parents keep continuous watch over their infants, noticing details that non-parents would never detect). One of the most common forms of post-positivism is a philosophy called critical realism. A critical realist believes that there is a reality independent of our thinking about it that science can study. (This is in contrast with a subjectivist who would hold that there is no external reality were each making this all up!). Positivists were also realists. The difference is that the post-positivist critical realist recognizes that all observation is fallible and has error and that all theory is revisable. In other words, the critical realist is critical of our ability to know reality with certainty. Where the positivist believed that the goal of science was to uncover the truth, the post-positivist critical realist believes that the goal of science is to hold steadfastly to the goal of getting it right about reality, even though we can never achieve that goal! Because all measurement is fallible, the post-positivist emphasizes the importance of multiple measures and observations, each of which may possess different types of error, and the need to use triangulation across these multiple errorful sources to try to get a better bead on whats happening in reality. The post-positivist also believes that all observations are theory-laden and that scientists (and everyone else, for that matter) are inherently biased by their cultural experiences, world views, and so on. This is not cause to give up in despair, however. Just because I have my world view based on my experiences and you have yours doesnt mean that we cant hope to translate from each others experiences or understand each other. That is, post-positivism rejects the relativist idea of the incommensurability of

Lord of the Flies Essay -- essays research papers

Lord of the Flies and the novel’s symbolism   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Lord of the flies is a thought-provoking novel authored by William Golding. This novel uses symbolism throughout its entirety to help portray importance and teach lessons. The book describes in detail the horrific exploits of a band of young children who make a striking transition from civilized to barbaric. Lord of the Flies commands a pessimistic outlook that seems to show that man is inherently tied to society, and without it, we would likely return to savagery. Golding does not come right out and show this however he uses symbolism to allow this idea to show. There are many different examples of symbolism in the Novel included are Piggy’s Glasses, the beast and fire. Perhaps the most symbolic of these is fire.   Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Ã‚  Throughout the novel fire served many, varied uses. Fire was used for warmth during the cold nights. It also created smoke, which served as a signal to potential rescuers. Perhaps the most basic, yet most important use for fire was for cooking. Without it the boys would not have been able to roast the pigs. The importance for fire was not at first understood by the boys. In Chapter Four the fire is out while a ship is spotted in the distance. If the fire was lit it could have been used to make smoke. In turn the smoke may have been used to signal the ship and save the boys. When questioned by Ralph, Jack and the others spew countless excuses to why the fire was...

A Difficult Decision Essay

I chose to write about a difficult decision I had to make years ago. I had to choose between leaving my family in hope of employment, or continue to let tax money support all of us. It was the best decision I have ever made. Starting truly from nothing, to living a normal happy life, and none of this was possible without my wife. She is the true warrior. She stuck by me through this whole thing. She always supported my decisions. It was a very confusing time in my life, but I had to do what was best for my family. In March of 2008, I was married to my wife, Lorene. I was 18 years old and ready to start a family. I was stupid. I made decent money working construction, but never expected to be laid off. My first son was born in October of 2008. So I got the family that I wanted, I just didn’t have a job now. We lived in Yucca Valley, California, where my Mother rented a home to us. She was a recovering alcoholic. She lived in Arizona with her husband at the time. Her name was Lari Lee Packer. I know, boys first name. Doctors told her that if she ever drank alcohol again, she would die. After I told her husband many times not to bring alcohol in the house, he continued. So in January of 2009, my Mother spent a few weeks drinking with her husband, and died. She was 44 years old. Immediately after her death, people were calling, and showing up at my Mother’s house in California. A lot of the people that showed up wanted me to sign papers to take over my Mother’s debt. My older brother had already advised me to refuse. The other party of people that came were there only to inform us that we had 24 hours to get out. My life was falling apart. We didn’t have any family in the area, nor any transportation. I was terrified. We ended up staying at a motel for two weeks, then moved down to the city of San Bernardino, where we lived with Lorene’s sister. Another year went by and we were still on welfare, and poorer than ever. I had nothing but my family, and a hard choice to make. I could stay and hope things would get better, or fly to my brother’s house in North Carolina and seek employment. It felt like such a long shot, but I had to do what was right. I couldn’t continue to feel useless. I made a family, just to be unable to provide for them. So I took the risk and flew to my brother’s house. I walked two miles down the railroad tracks everyday, to go apply for jobs. On the fourth day, I was hired at McDonalds and a gas station. It sounds pathetic, but I no longer had standards since I was unemployed for so long. I would work endless hours, only to come home, collapse on my brother’s couch for four hours, get up and do it again. I continued this schedule for three weeks before deciding to leave McDonalds. By the time I received my last check from McDonalds, I had saved enough money, and flew my family to North Carolina. In conclusion, it was a difficult decision to leave my family and venture into the unknown, but it was the best decision I have ever made. I think people need to remind themselves from time to time, â€Å"what is best for the family†? I now work as a hotel desk clerk, and I have a lot of free time. After discovering how much free time was available, I had to further pursue my education. So here I am, and that’s what’s best for my family. A Difficult Decision Essay In Richard Wilbur’s poem â€Å"A Barred Owl† and the poem â€Å"The History Teacher† by Billy Collins, both describe adults attempt to protect children from fears that are known and unknown to them, sugar-coating real life events that could harm the children’s innocence. An elementary school teacher in â€Å"The History Teacher† tries to shelter his students from what he thinks would affect the children’s view on the world while parents in â€Å"A Barred Owl† assure their â€Å"wakened child† that the â€Å"boom of an owl’s voice† are simple questions from a curious â€Å"forest bird†. Both writers convey that grown-ups who try to preserve the innocence of children only delay the inevitable. Richard Wilbur depicts a common situation of a frightened child in the dark of the night seeking guidance from mom and dad. The writer distinguishes the mood and setting with lines such as, â€Å"The warping night air,† or, â€Å"darkened room. † Wilbur uses these lines to help the reader understand the mood of the poem by using certain diction to portray the fear that is present within this child’s bedroom. See more: The stages of consumer buying decision process essay The meaning of each line is enhanced due to the author writing in an AABB rhyming pattern; emphasizing the significance of each rhyme such as the lines, â€Å"The warping night air having brought the boom of an owl’s voice into her darkened room† or, â€Å"Words, which can make our terrors bravely clear, can also thus domesticate a fear† and even, â€Å"Or dreaming of some small thing in a claw borne up to some dark branch and eaten raw. By Richard Wilbur displaying a simple situation of a scared child, he displays the actions parents take in order to ease and comfort a child to not only preserve their innocence but to also take away any fear a child has while dealing with this type of situation and many others. In the poem, â€Å"A History Teacher† by Billy Collins, the writer illustrates a casual classroom full of ignorant children being educated by their teacher. Little did these children know that their history teacher is presenting altered historical events in order to protect their innocence. By using the lines, â€Å"the Ice Age was really just the Chilly Age,† or, â€Å"the Stone Age became the Gravel Age,† Collins demonstrates the teachers attempt to shield the students from the outside world. The author speaks in third person to create an image in which the audience can fully understand rather than reading from first person. By the author choosing third person rather than first person, the audience will not read from a perspective from a character within the story, therefore receiving a reliable perspective and not â€Å"one side of the story†. Writer Billy Collins helps the reader further understand how the teachers attempt to shelter his students from the cruel Darwinism of the world did nothing but harm their education. The lines, â€Å"The children †¦ torment the weak and the smart,† and, â€Å"he gathered his notes †¦ wondering if they would believe†¦Ã¢â‚¬  displays the reality of the teacher being the ignorant character other than the students by harming their education in order to protect them from the inevitable. With Richard Wilbur using the lines â€Å"And send a small child back to sleep at night† to the lines â€Å"Borne up to some dark branch and eaten raw† in â€Å"A Barred Owl† the writer allows the audience to understand the child’s contentment as she goes to sleep as an innocent child. The audience also understands that with the child being sent to bed with a white lie, she remains ignorant from the Darwinism of the world. Although, in Billy Collins’ â€Å"The History Teacher† the students continue to act in Darwinism as they carry on to â€Å"torment the weak and the smart†¦ breaking their glasses,† and both the teacher and children go home from learning and feeling nothing when the child and parents in â€Å"A Barred Owl† go to sleep with peace and understanding that fear is no where to be found. The History Teacher† is told in third person point of view for the audience to conceive both sides of the result the teacher has caused by his choice of guidance. â€Å"A Barred Owl† is written in first person point of view to display the parents decision on soothing a frightened child; both poems present both sides of the outcomes the adults cause. Richard Wilbur and Billy Collins expose adults’ attempt to prevent children from losing their innocence although the writers also display an example of adults doing anything possible, striving to prohibit what is destined. Parents should ease children into the real world rather than be afraid of their children entering corruption. â€Å"A Barred Owl† and â€Å"The History Teacher† opens adults’ eyes to where adults realize when and where a child should enter the real world. Adults should guide children through troubling times and not alter their view of the world so much it can become destructive.

Free Essays on Transforming The Federal Role

Transforming the Federal Role in Education So That No Child is Left Behind Summary of President George Bushes Education Reform Policy â€Å"We have a genuine national crisis. More and more, we are divided into two nations. One that reads, and one that doesn't. One that dreams, and one that doesn'tâ€Å" (Presidents George W. Bush 2000). One of the most interesting, and controversial topics in the Bush Administration is America’s Education Reform. Unfortunately, with the 21st Centuries hope and promise comes a group of needy students who are unable to read at a basic level. Our high school seniors are behind students of other countries on international math tests and almost 1/3 of our college freshmen are finding it necessary to take remedial courses before they are able to begin regular college courses. There has been a concern for some time throughout America regarding the quality of public education. Students are graduating from high school without adequate knowledge of the three R's. Universities are recruiting a multitude of incompetent pseudo-scholars. Employers don't understand why the new generation of workers do not possess the basic skills to perform the job. It would appear that American students are not learning as much as their parents did. And yet, teachers are still teaching, taxes are still being paid, and more funds than ever are being appropriated for public education. What's going on in America's classrooms? With the poor state of our educational system, National Standards are in the spot light. Although education has typically been the primary responsibility of local or state governments, the Bush administration is now getting involved. STANDARDS IN EDUCATION General standards in education have existed formally for over a century but as time went on, local school systems have expanded their curriculum to meet the needs of the local community. Bush is looking for National standards ... Free Essays on Transforming The Federal Role Free Essays on Transforming The Federal Role Transforming the Federal Role in Education So That No Child is Left Behind Summary of President George Bushes Education Reform Policy â€Å"We have a genuine national crisis. More and more, we are divided into two nations. One that reads, and one that doesn't. One that dreams, and one that doesn'tâ€Å" (Presidents George W. Bush 2000). One of the most interesting, and controversial topics in the Bush Administration is America’s Education Reform. Unfortunately, with the 21st Centuries hope and promise comes a group of needy students who are unable to read at a basic level. Our high school seniors are behind students of other countries on international math tests and almost 1/3 of our college freshmen are finding it necessary to take remedial courses before they are able to begin regular college courses. There has been a concern for some time throughout America regarding the quality of public education. Students are graduating from high school without adequate knowledge of the three R's. Universities are recruiting a multitude of incompetent pseudo-scholars. Employers don't understand why the new generation of workers do not possess the basic skills to perform the job. It would appear that American students are not learning as much as their parents did. And yet, teachers are still teaching, taxes are still being paid, and more funds than ever are being appropriated for public education. What's going on in America's classrooms? With the poor state of our educational system, National Standards are in the spot light. Although education has typically been the primary responsibility of local or state governments, the Bush administration is now getting involved. STANDARDS IN EDUCATION General standards in education have existed formally for over a century but as time went on, local school systems have expanded their curriculum to meet the needs of the local community. Bush is looking for National standards ...

buy custom Life of a Native American essay

buy custom Life of a Native American essay Native Americans are the indigenous people of the continent of North America that is within the boundaries of the present United States of America. These Native Americans did express preference by referring to themselves as American-Indians. They are composed of many small and distinct tribes of which most survive as intact political communities. The cultures of Native Americans were matrilineal: the land they occupied was for use by the whole community for agricultural practices and hunting. The migration of the Europeans to their land and African slaves importation led to consistent conflicts and adjustments of the old and new societies. The Europeans had culture of patriarchal which had a concept of individual property rights different from that of Native Americans in respect to land. These cultural differences between the Native Americans and the Europeans and the shifting alliances of this culture caused ethnic violence and social disruptions among the different nations (Reynold son 123). The revolution of the colonies against Great Britain and the establishment of the United States of America conceived the idea of Native American assimilation as its citizens. This was a policy that was consistent in all American administrations. The expansion of the European-American to the west increased the pressure of the Native American lands, and war between the groups and tension was raised. An Indian removal act was passed by the congress in 1830, which authorized the relocation of the Native Americans of the Deep South away from their homelands to the west. This was in order for them to accommodate the coastal regions. The Native Americans live in the Southern part of the current United States of America, and are recognized by the state government as tribes. This has been the situation since the late 20th century, with some tribes being recognized by the federal government. The American-Indians were subjected to genocide during the process of expanding the United States of America, and the survivors have been subjected to cultural assaults to present days. The Indian claim for reparation Historical records show that there was factual predication that obligated the genocide of the Native Americans. The element of land theft is treated as the only relevant moral aspect that the Indians can claim. Justice As Supersession (JAS) argues that the land that was illicitly acquired by the colonist cannot be returned as the land has been passed on to the descendants (Johnston). The JAS theorists are against the current justice to restore the land occupied by the innocent descendant of the white colonists to the Indian ownership given that there is no direct connection of todays people and those who lived many generations ago. The restoration of these lands would lead to practical effects especially among the impoverished ones. The Indians claimed that, for centuries, they have been living as colonized people and being victimized by the world's racists. The reparation due is thus for the killing, degradation and the exploitation of the Indians Americans (Bradford 69). The government needs to consider and respond to the issue of reparaion in the form of economic compensation with an apology for the past atrocities committed. Arguments Against There are plenty of arguments against the reparation as most disagree with the payments. Most people describe reparation as being an ineffective solution, unnecessary and of all they view it to be racist. The argument claims that there was no individual group that was responsible for the atrocities committed. This is because these acts were among the natives tribe and between the colonists. It goes further to claim that there is economic prosperity as the Indian live better off economically and are able to compete with other people in the society (Morris and Young 112). Therefore, it is difficult to ask the descendants of those who were fighting against the land grabbing to pay reparation. This is due to the fact that most of the descendants are immigrants and were not in USA during that period. Thus, it is impossible to ask for reparation for crimes that were committed by their ancestors (Tribe). Reparation is seen to be based on race as the judgment does not recognize the injuries inflicted. The case also points out that there had been no payment of reparation to anyone apart from the victims or their direct descendants, though there is no effect to payment of reparation. The reparation is seen to be unfair as the descendants are not suffering economically as a result of losing land. They had a lot of opportunities to be economically successful as many have already achieved this economic success, and those not are viewed to be victims of their own failures, not the US system. Thus, they should not get reparation. Reparation is viewed as a way to view the Indians as victims instead of holding them for the state of the modern society. This implies that reparation is viewed as a way of helping out the lazy people in the society (Norris and Cindy 78). Many people opposed to the reparation of Indians claim that it has been paid through the enactment of the civil right Act, and the welfare benefits. Thus, reparation could lead to division of races with the white who are unwilling to pass for reparation feeling that these Indians are taking what they do not deserve. Reparation opposes do not feel the guilty of Indians' status in the society as they blame it on their own failure to succeed. Pro Reparation Reparation for the Native Americans for the land that was unlawfully taken from them is crucial. This is because most of the Native Americans were forced out of their homelands with or without compensation by the colonists. The reparationcan be done through courts where there is monetary compensation and the restoring of land illegally taken. The Native American leaders have taken their case to the United Nation which has already written on the Declaration on the Rights of Native Americans. The provisions that are included in the declaration are the restitution of lands, territories and resources. The native right Fund represents Native Americans' groups in negotiation to restore their treaty status to sovereignty for treaty guaranteed resources (Johnston). This clearly indicates the realization of the US goovernment of the right of reparation and compensation for racial oppression. The Justice As Compensation (JAC) theorists accept that the historical deprivation of the native Americans of land has the relationship with the current material deprivation that is being experienced, and their compensation is viewed as an ordinary corrective justice where some group based autonomies benefit from the Indians redress. Justice As Restoration (JAR) claims that even the compensation of the land, which was taken, in value cannot rectify the injustices that were committed historically. It views the restoration as only essential to set the injustices to be right. In fact, this injustices loom enormously in the descendants' minds. JAR is, thus, advocating for full restoration of the claims that are acknowledged publicly apologizing for the past acts accepting the social punishment (Bradford 520). The US administration has the duty to issue an official apology acknowledging the harm that was inflicted on Native Americans, which signifies the, symbolic recognition of the past acts to Indians (Bradford 49). This apology incorporates the recognition of the moral obligation in peacemaking negotiations. Commemoration is vital so as to ensure that the future generations do not perpetuate the past with the erection of monuments that will be signifying the past genocide of the Indians. Land restoration will be difficult as the scarcity of the private property, and the refusal to commit the unjust enrichment by the whites will have to generate acclimate of restitution. Therefore, it will prove difficult to reach a consensus of the measure to be implemented that will result to just and agreement that will not favor the opposition. The colonists are citizens of the US and even after the restoration of land to Indians they will have nowhere to go if the transformation evicts them from their homes. The subject of land restoration will trigger hate as many whites will claim that they were not there when these atrocities were being committed. Thus, they owe nothing to the Indians (Coop, Nori and Cory 60). The Indians are said to have ceded lands in the free process without fraud or duress along with individuals who posses the land. The restoration of the land right will affect the white possessors. Therefore, even if the US is committed to this restoration, it will lead to impoverishment of the ejected whites. Conclusion The Native Americans should be reparated of the land they lost. The forceful removal of their reservations and their subsequent life of impoverishment should be compensated. This is because the lives of the modern Indians are filled with poverty. This is despite the fact that they are the rightful owner of the US. This discrimination and deprivation of the Indians has led the current generation to be miserable. These Indians have been discriminated against by the white who are still enriching themselves by exploiting these natives. There are no economic incentives that are provided, and the wages that one is paid as a native is less in comparison to what the pay to their white folks. Thus, it is not possible for these natives to be economically. Buy custom Life of a Native American essay

Vulnerable population Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

Vulnerable population - Essay Example They entail IDEA, ADA, Rehabilitation Act, Housing facility Act and Telecommunication Act and their amendments, the open and closed ended entitlement programs for disabled insurance and benefits, and the federal and state grant programs. This document provides a discussion on these people in the US society and also covers the 2020 objectives of ensuring healthy people in the disabled population, and the various roles of nurses in supporting this vulnerable group. Keywords: Disability, Nurses, Statistics, Policies, Americans with Disability Act (ADA), Barriers to Healthcare, Public Health, Age Introduction There is a big number of disabled people in the world population than anyone could ever imagine. While some can speak up for themselves and appear in the public, others are left under homecare and centres. Disabilities vary; they could be permanent or temporary and could affect varying body parts and functions. According to the US federal government, disability is defined â€Å"as a mental or physical impairment, which substantially limits one or more major life activities,† hence, ranging from physiological to psychological disorders and more non listed conditions (Wisconsin Department of Health services, 2013). Federal and States Policies on Disability The government has since the last century made efforts to remove the barriers in the society that prevent the disabled from enjoying their rights as the rest of the people. In these modern times, the employers, learning institutions and most organizations have to respect the public policies and provide opportunities for this group. Over the last century, laws were enacted and have been amended over time to enable the improved living conditions of the disabled in the society. The Fair Housing Act of 1968 and its amendment in 1988 makes it possible for all people to access housing without discrimination, ensures disabled people are free to rent or buy a house, and requires proprietors of housing facilitie s to design housing units for the disabled with their policies exclusions in mind (U.S. Department of justice, 2009). The revised Telecommunication Act of 1996 works to ensure that the disabled group has access to usable equipment and service. This could imply special equipments with features to facilitate their operation. The disabled students are also facilitated with appropriate education in an environment that fits their individual needs. The Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) guarantees individuals with disabilities a free appropriate public education, and requires that the public school system follow a recommended procedure in development of individualized education program (IEP) for each child (U.S. Department of justice, 2009). The other two civil rights statutes are ADA and the Rehabilitation Act that are of great concern in the modern society. The Americans with Disability Act of 1990 (ADA) â€Å"prohibits discrimination on the basis of disability in employment, public ser vices, public accommodations, and Telecommunications† and the Rehabilitation Act â€Å"prohibits discrimination by recipients of Federal Aid† (â€Å"Federal Disability Policy Framework† n.d., p. 5). Others are grant and entitlement programs that provide insurance or other benefits in the respective states. 2020 Objective The 2020

English Test Paper Evaluation Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 3500 words

English Test Paper Evaluation - Essay Example The students could be asked to summarize the text in 100 words. This is a good method of evaluating if the text was understood and it also gives the students the possibility to use their vocabulary, no matter how poor it is. Some students may find using their own words a little frustrating, but it is important to underline that they do not have to write a lot, just as little as 100 words. Another variation could be stating the theme, the main ideas or even for the more advanced, giving their own opinion on the topic. After the holistic tasks, there can be used some specific ones. For example, explaining the words in the context and using them in their own sentences can activate the vocabulary used. Anyhow one of the most popular reading comprehension exercises is the multiple-choice items. The success of this exercise consists of more answer option that can reduce the chance of guessing the correct answer. The multitudes of items aid the student and reduce the ambiguity of the task. The multiple choices offer a great flexibility in the goals that are expected and assessed, that can be knowledge, application, vocabulary, analysis and so on. On the other hand, there are also some cons when we talk about multiple choices. The reading time increases as the number of answers is higher. There cannot be presented so many questions and it turns out to be difficult to write four or five reasonable and logical answers. Reading comprehension is one of the greatest ways of getting the holistic image of someone's knowledge.... It requires not only reading skills, but also logic and good vocabulary. Hirsch Jr. states that "a big difference between an expert and a novice reader is the ability to take in basic features very fast, thereby leaving the mind free to concentrate on important features." (Hirsch 3) In this way, the progress of a student can be monitored and his lacks in understanding the language can be corrected. The text must be carefully chosen. For example a text that contains way too many technical or medical terms is rather improper for a secondary learned, unless he was introduced before in the terminology. One of the most used methods is to include roughly-tuned texts that have a real source, but were changed in order to be more accessible for students. Another method is to select a short or medium length article, but in this case we must pay attention to the possible grammar mistakes. The great thing here is that there is a large range of texts from which one can choose. After choosing the text, there are various ways in which we can assess the knowledge gained and the understanding of the text. The students could be asked to summarize the text in 100 words. This is a good method of evaluating if the text was understood and it also gives the students the possibility to use their vocabulary, no matter how poor it is. Some students may find using their own words a little frustrating, but it is important to underline that they do not have to write a lot, just as little as 100 words. Another variation could be stating the theme, the main ideas or even for the more advanced, giving their own opinion on the topic. After the holistic tasks, there can be used some specific ones. For example,